MC and Celiac
Moderators: Rosie, Stanz, Jean, CAMary, moremuscle, JFR, Dee, xet, Peggy, Matthew, Gabes-Apg, grannyh, Gloria, Mars, starfire, Polly, Joefnh
Jenny,
I see that's a new study. They showed only about a 5% overlap between the two diseases, (40 out of 763). An Australian study, done almost 10 years ago, found that 40% of the patients with CC, who had a small intestinal biopsy, also had celiac disease, (4 out of 10).
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1401208
The Australian study was much smaller, so it doesn't carry the confidence level of a larger study, but I wonder if the key difference between the results of the two studies might be that not all of the MC cohort in the Canadian study had been subjected to an upper endoscopy with biopsies. If the researchers were just looking at hospital diagnostic records, then not all of the MC patients would have had an upper endoscopy exam, with biopsies, and if they didn't, then even if they happened to have celiac disease, there's no way that they could have been diagnosed, without the biopsies, so they would have been missed, in the study.
The fact that they found that middle-aged women were most likely to have both diseases, makes me suspicious, because it brings to mind the age-old problem of only "looking for MC" in women of a specific age group. IOW, by the same token, patients outside of that demographic may not have been as likely to have had an upper endoscopy with biopsies, thus preventing them from being diagnosed with concurrent celiac disease.
That would have been a stupid mistake on the part of the researchers, but as we all know, researchers make stupid mistakes every day.
Tex
Tex
I see that's a new study. They showed only about a 5% overlap between the two diseases, (40 out of 763). An Australian study, done almost 10 years ago, found that 40% of the patients with CC, who had a small intestinal biopsy, also had celiac disease, (4 out of 10).
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1401208
The Australian study was much smaller, so it doesn't carry the confidence level of a larger study, but I wonder if the key difference between the results of the two studies might be that not all of the MC cohort in the Canadian study had been subjected to an upper endoscopy with biopsies. If the researchers were just looking at hospital diagnostic records, then not all of the MC patients would have had an upper endoscopy exam, with biopsies, and if they didn't, then even if they happened to have celiac disease, there's no way that they could have been diagnosed, without the biopsies, so they would have been missed, in the study.
The fact that they found that middle-aged women were most likely to have both diseases, makes me suspicious, because it brings to mind the age-old problem of only "looking for MC" in women of a specific age group. IOW, by the same token, patients outside of that demographic may not have been as likely to have had an upper endoscopy with biopsies, thus preventing them from being diagnosed with concurrent celiac disease.
That would have been a stupid mistake on the part of the researchers, but as we all know, researchers make stupid mistakes every day.
Tex
Tex
It is suspected that some of the hardest material known to science can be found in the skulls of GI specialists who insist that diet has nothing to do with the treatment of microscopic colitis.
- MBombardier
- Rockhopper Penguin

- Posts: 1523
- Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2010 10:44 am
- Location: Vancouver, WA
I am confident, based on my fecal fat absorption number value and my family history, that I have celiac disease, and feel no need of an endoscopy to prove it, since it wouldn't change anything that I do or eat. So I would have been missed in this study.
Marliss Bombardier
Dum spiro, spero -- While I breathe, I hope
Psoriasis - the dark ages
Hashimoto's Thyroiditis - Dec 2001
Collagenous Colitis - Sept 2010
Granuloma Annulare - June 2011
Dum spiro, spero -- While I breathe, I hope
Psoriasis - the dark ages
Hashimoto's Thyroiditis - Dec 2001
Collagenous Colitis - Sept 2010
Granuloma Annulare - June 2011

Visit the Microscopic Colitis Foundation Website

