Dr. Briffa blogged about a research article published this past June, that indicated that the diet our paleo ancestors actually ate, apparently ranged from 3% to 50% carbohydrates. Evidently, the farther away from the equator people lived, the lower their carb intake, which certainly makes sense, since plants grow best near the equator. Of course, these data were based on projections made from the diets of more recent hunter-gatherer tribes, but that's probably the best source of information available, at this stage of the game, since the paleo people didn't keep "winning the poo" diaries, (at least, none have been found, so far).
The most interesting part, though, is the observation that overall, the average hunter-gatherer living in paleo times averaged a diet containing about 20% carbohydrates. So why are our governments, our doctors, and all the other "health experts", trying to convince us that we need to eat a diet that contains 60% carbs, in order to be healthy? That's significantly higher than even the carb percentage of paleo ancestors who lived right on the equator, and it's obviously 3 times the average.
Sure, we can survive on a diet that contains 60% carbs, but is it healthy?
http://www.drbriffa.com/2011/10/11/it-l ... carb-diet/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21745624
Tex

Visit the Microscopic Colitis Foundation Website



