One Of The Risks Of Taking A PPI Has Been Clarified

Feel free to discuss any topic of general interest, so long as nothing you post here is likely to be interpreted as insulting, and/or inflammatory, nor clearly designed to provoke any individual or group. Please be considerate of others feelings, and they will be considerate of yours.

Moderators: Rosie, Stanz, Jean, CAMary, moremuscle, JFR, Dee, xet, Peggy, Matthew, Gabes-Apg, grannyh, Gloria, Mars, starfire, Polly, Joefnh

Post Reply
User avatar
tex
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 35349
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 9:00 am
Location: Central Texas

One Of The Risks Of Taking A PPI Has Been Clarified

Post by tex »

Hi All,

The case against taking a PPI has gain some more strength with the latest research results:
The message is clear: Postmenopausal women with history of smoking who take PPIs for longer than two years have more than a 50% chance of sustaining a hip fracture, says researcher Hamed Khalili, MD. He is a gastroenterologist at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston.
That's a incredibly bad risk, to say the least. The good news is that the increased risk appears to only affect those with a history of cigarette smoking, and it seems to fade away after 2 years have passed without taking any PPI drugs.

http://www.webmd.com/heartburn-gerd/new ... ures-women

Tex
:cowboy:

It is suspected that some of the hardest material known to science can be found in the skulls of GI specialists who insist that diet has nothing to do with the treatment of microscopic colitis.
User avatar
draperygoddess
Rockhopper Penguin
Rockhopper Penguin
Posts: 558
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 6:49 am
Location: Tennessee

Post by draperygoddess »

I wonder what the chances are for postmenopaual non-smokers?
Cynthia

"Can we fix it? YES WE CAN!" -Bob the Builder
User avatar
Lesley
King Penguin
King Penguin
Posts: 2920
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 11:13 pm
Contact:

Post by Lesley »

And what does a history of smoking mean? I smoked for far less years than I haven't now. Do I qualify? Or do I have to be smoking or smoked recently.
User avatar
tex
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 35349
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 9:00 am
Location: Central Texas

Post by tex »

Cynthia wrote:I wonder what the chances are for postmenopaual non-smokers?
Based on the deceptive trends in the conclusions of most research reports these days, I'd have to guess it's probably around 49%. :lol: I'm just joking, of course - I have no idea what it might be, but contemporary research reports tend to go out of their way to make mountains out of molehills, so that their results will appear much more impressive than they actually are. :roll:

Lesley wrote:And what does a history of smoking mean?
You would probably have to read the full report to find exactly what they mean by that term. Whatever it is, you can bet that they adjusted it to meet their goals.

Tex
:cowboy:

It is suspected that some of the hardest material known to science can be found in the skulls of GI specialists who insist that diet has nothing to do with the treatment of microscopic colitis.
User avatar
MBombardier
Rockhopper Penguin
Rockhopper Penguin
Posts: 1523
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2010 10:44 am
Location: Vancouver, WA

Post by MBombardier »

I didn't read the article so I am talking from a position of relative ignorance, but I wonder if genetics were factored in? This sounds like one of those scare-stats that are touted now and then. On the other hand, since PPI's are pushed so much...?

All I can say is I am so thankful that being in remission has effectively quashed my GERD.
Marliss Bombardier

Dum spiro, spero -- While I breathe, I hope

Psoriasis - the dark ages
Hashimoto's Thyroiditis - Dec 2001
Collagenous Colitis - Sept 2010
Granuloma Annulare - June 2011
User avatar
tex
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 35349
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 9:00 am
Location: Central Texas

Post by tex »

There are more than just genetics that might skew the result. Consider that smoking is no longer in vogue - that in itself is going to tilt the age bias toward older subjects, because younger people aren't as likely to smoke, nor do they break hips. That automatically puts smokers at a higher risk, because as a group, they are generally significantly older.

IOW, by selecting for smoking, they automatically selected for older subjects. Or am I wrong? :shrug:

Tex
:cowboy:

It is suspected that some of the hardest material known to science can be found in the skulls of GI specialists who insist that diet has nothing to do with the treatment of microscopic colitis.
User avatar
MBombardier
Rockhopper Penguin
Rockhopper Penguin
Posts: 1523
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2010 10:44 am
Location: Vancouver, WA

Post by MBombardier »

Good question. I was pretty wild when I was younger, but I haven't smoked anything for about 25 years. I sure see a lot of young ones smoking, but that may be a local phenomenon.
Marliss Bombardier

Dum spiro, spero -- While I breathe, I hope

Psoriasis - the dark ages
Hashimoto's Thyroiditis - Dec 2001
Collagenous Colitis - Sept 2010
Granuloma Annulare - June 2011
Post Reply

Return to “Main Message Board”