Colonoscopy

Feel free to discuss any topic of general interest, so long as nothing you post here is likely to be interpreted as insulting, and/or inflammatory, nor clearly designed to provoke any individual or group. Please be considerate of others feelings, and they will be considerate of yours.

Moderators: Rosie, Stanz, Jean, CAMary, moremuscle, JFR, Dee, xet, Peggy, Matthew, Gabes-Apg, grannyh, Gloria, Mars, starfire, Polly, Joefnh

Post Reply
desertrat
Gentoo Penguin
Gentoo Penguin
Posts: 323
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 11:28 am
Location: Chandler, AZ

Colonoscopy

Post by desertrat »

Does anyone know how often a person with MC should get a colonoscopy? Every year? Every five? Never again?

Mandy
User avatar
tex
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 35349
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 9:00 am
Location: Central Texas

Post by tex »

Whatever your normal cancer-screening interval happens to be.

Tex
:cowboy:

It is suspected that some of the hardest material known to science can be found in the skulls of GI specialists who insist that diet has nothing to do with the treatment of microscopic colitis.
starfire
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 5198
Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 5:48 am
Location: Pennsylvania

Post by starfire »

I totally agree because whether or not MC shows up with the biopsies... I don't think it matter one whit. If you have MC you have it for life. You may go into remission but the possibility is still there. If I'm wrong, someone correct me please.

Love, Shirley
When the eagles are silent, the parrots begin to jabber"
-- Winston Churchill
desertrat
Gentoo Penguin
Gentoo Penguin
Posts: 323
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 11:28 am
Location: Chandler, AZ

Post by desertrat »

I don't know what a normal screening time would be. And doesn't a colonoscopy aggravate MC?

Mandy
User avatar
tex
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 35349
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 9:00 am
Location: Central Texas

Post by tex »

http://www.cancer.org/Healthy/FindCance ... -of-cancer

The scoping may or may not aggravate it, but the caustic solutions used for cleanout not only aggravate MC, but can trigger it. Once in a while, though, some patients find that the cleanout stops their D, or at least puts it on hold for a while.

Shirley is quite correct, of course.

Tex
:cowboy:

It is suspected that some of the hardest material known to science can be found in the skulls of GI specialists who insist that diet has nothing to do with the treatment of microscopic colitis.
Polly
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 5185
Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 3:34 am
Location: Maryland

Post by Polly »

Hi Mandy,

I agree with the above. Actually, I am a case in point for what Shirley said. I had a relapse after having a normal biopsy. And, as Tex indicated, I believe it may have been due to the corrosive cleanout drug (a 2-week supply of Miralax taken all at once).

I really don't think continuing MC is a valid reason for repeating the colonoscopy, although some GI docs seem ro recommend more frequent colonoscopies, especailly when they have no idea what to do with continuing/recurring MC symptoms.

The usual recommended frequency is once every 10 years between ages 50 and 75. Unless there is a family history of colon cancer - then it will be done earlier. Or unless polyps are found - then every 5 years is recommended. (I had polyps on 2 occasions so am on a 5 yr. interval). Of course, I wish that I would NEVER have to have another one! LOL!

Love,

Polly
Blessed are they who can laugh at themselves, for they shall never cease to be amused.
User avatar
Zizzle
King Penguin
King Penguin
Posts: 3492
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 9:47 am

Post by Zizzle »

So for those of us under 50, there is no need for a colonoscopy until we're 50? I had my diagnostic colonoscopy at age 35, and I vaguely recall my GI recommending 8 years...but she's not my doc anymore, so it's up to me. :cool:
User avatar
tex
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 35349
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 9:00 am
Location: Central Texas

Post by tex »

As long as the exam didn't find any polyps, that schedule should work. If any polyps were removed, I'd suggest 5 years.

Tex
:cowboy:

It is suspected that some of the hardest material known to science can be found in the skulls of GI specialists who insist that diet has nothing to do with the treatment of microscopic colitis.
Deb
Rockhopper Penguin
Rockhopper Penguin
Posts: 1657
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 7:01 pm
Location: Previously MN now GA

Post by Deb »

I had polyps at 50,removal showed no issues, another colonoscopy 5 years later with more polyps which were removed, another colonoscopy due to MC 3 years later, no polyps and I believe I don't need another one for 10 years. I have an appointment with my pcp this year and will confirm this. That's all the medical care I'm getting these days and it is at the Mayo Clinic, which in spite of some of their positions, I believe, has excellent medical care.
User avatar
draperygoddess
Rockhopper Penguin
Rockhopper Penguin
Posts: 558
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 6:49 am
Location: Tennessee

Post by draperygoddess »

Okay, here's my two cents' worth: I have a family history of rampant colon cancer (the 13th case was just diagnosed about a month ago), so I have done a hemocult every 5 years since I was 20, and last year when I turned 40 the doctor did a colonoscopy. Despite the fact that my scope didn't show any polyps or cancer, I will still have one every 5 years because of the family history. Colon cancer is a slow-moving cancer that is 98% curable IF it's caught in the early stages. If it spreads beyond the colon, the survival rates drop way off. SO, yes, I know that those of us with MC dread a relapse due to the prep for a colonoscopy, and yes, it's unpleasant, but if you've ever had any polyps, or if you have a family history, you should be scoped every 5 years. I would rather have MC than cancer.

By the way, that 13th case? My mother's 60-year-old cousin, who had not had a colonoscopy (despite the family history), and now has stage-4 colon cancer. His dad had colon cancer 20 years ago, but it was caught early and he survived it. The son probably won't.
Cynthia

"Can we fix it? YES WE CAN!" -Bob the Builder
User avatar
Gloria
King Penguin
King Penguin
Posts: 4767
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 8:19 am
Location: Illinois

Post by Gloria »

Polly wrote:I really don't think continuing MC is a valid reason for repeating the colonoscopy, although some GI docs seem ro recommend more frequent colonoscopies, especailly when they have no idea what to do with continuing/recurring MC symptoms.
That's exactly what my GI recommended today. It's been 5 years since my last colonoscopy. He doesn't have a clue how to manage my MC, other than prescribe Entocort, so he's thinking that I must have something else wrong. I figured that would be his suggestion because he pushed for one the last time I saw him. When I balked and told him I didn't want to put such a caustic solution into my intestines, he got very defensive and said that hundreds of thousand of people have taken it, even 80-year-old women with thin colons, and they are doing fine. I countered and told him that my colon is already inflamed - why would I put something caustic into it? At the end of the visit, he suggested that he could do a sigmoidoscopy and I'd only have to do an enema. I didn't jump on his suggestion, of course.

Gloria
You never know what you can do until you have to do it.
Polly
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 5185
Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 3:34 am
Location: Maryland

Post by Polly »

Gloria,

Good for you for standing your ground. And if colonoscopies were no problem for 80 yr. olds, why have they recently recommended to stop doing them after age 75??? You must feel so frustrated with your GI doc. Hang in there............

Hugs,

Polly
Blessed are they who can laugh at themselves, for they shall never cease to be amused.
User avatar
tex
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 35349
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 9:00 am
Location: Central Texas

Post by tex »

Gastroenterologists who want to do another colonoscopy because the patient isn't responding to treatment, are a lot like Linus in the Charlie Brown cartoon series, always searching for the giant pumpkin. The gastros are always expecting to find something in there that they missed the first time, but they never do. Like Linus, though, they're convinced that it will eventually show up, if they keep searching. :roll: It never dawns on them they just don't know how to treat the disease. :lol:

Tex
:cowboy:

It is suspected that some of the hardest material known to science can be found in the skulls of GI specialists who insist that diet has nothing to do with the treatment of microscopic colitis.
User avatar
MaggieRedwings
King Penguin
King Penguin
Posts: 3865
Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 3:16 am
Location: SE Pennsylvania

Post by MaggieRedwings »

Since I have given up on GIs my PCP is trying to push me to a colonoscopy. I am adamantly refusing and she is not happy but I explained that the caustic chemicals ingested for clean out might put me back at step 1 in healing. Needless to say, I don't think she gets it. So for me no more.

Love, Maggie
Maggie Scarpone
___________________
Resident Birder - I live to bird and enjoy life!
User avatar
DebE13
Rockhopper Penguin
Rockhopper Penguin
Posts: 1657
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 5:32 am
Location: Wisconsin

Post by DebE13 »

After my diagnosis 5 years ago I was told to do another one in 5 years. Due to some severe health issues and changing doctors, I had it done after 4 years. My GI removed a polyp so I'm scheduled for another in 3 years. Not looking forward to it, but it makes sense in my case.
Post Reply

Return to “Main Message Board”