Terri wrote:That's discouraging to me.
Nobody ever said that it was easy. In fact, we regularly point out that tracking down the foods that trigger reactions for us is usually very difficult, time consuming, and frustrating. Unfortunately, there is no such thing as a test (of any type, for any purpose) that is 100% reliable, and adequately sensitive, for every patient. The MRT is the second most beneficial test for most people who have MC. That doesn't mean that it's a perfect test, by a long shot — it just means that after the EnteroLab tests, it's the second most likely test to be helpful for tracking down elusive food sensitivities.
Terri wrote:Also the MRT test showed high intolerances to foods that these gals never even consume. Why is that?
That's because the innate immune system does not require that food antigens be ingested in order to show a response. The MRT does not measure or even detect immunoglobulin antibody levels. It measures blood mediator responses by a completely different method.
Terri wrote:I still get shocked how people still have D even after removing so much from the diet.
Remember, the general population is loaded with people who sometimes, frequently, or always have D, even though they do not have a digestive system disease. Diet can do it, (too much liquid, too many hot spices, caffeine, etc.), stress can do it, dehydration can do it, and there are probably umpteen other causes of non-pathogenic D that I can't think of at the moment. When I was much younger, back when agriculture required much more hand labor, we often employed migrant workers from Mexico. Virtually every one of those guys always had D, due to their diet — they just assumed that it was normal, and where they came from, it probably was.
Tex