wmonique2 wrote:Hello y'all,
Now that we all gathered under Leah's tent, I'll venture to ask a question that's been gnawing at me for a good while.
Has anyone's symptoms been WORSE since diagnosed? And more importantly, the more I eliminate THE MORE sensitive I seem to become.
Here's what my scenario is (I'll make it brief): after diagnosis I was put on mesalamine, got better immediately, ate EVERYTHING. Eight months later went to Italy and France, ate EVERYTHING, drank wine.
I come back, read on the condition and decide that I better go GF. I got GF and soon thereafter I start having symptoms of nausea and cramps.
It seems to me that the more I eliminate, the more sensitive I have become to everything else.
Now I am two years post diagnosis and I am NOT healing. Still on mesalamine, added elavil inspite of all the eliminations (GF, SF, DF, low histamine and low fiber) I AM NOT HEALING. Just trying to stay symptom-free.
Has anybody gotten worse since diagnosis? Has anybody gotten MORE sensitive? Does anyone have a theory about this?
Thank you all.
Monique
Monique,
I can understand why you feel you are the victim of a dilemma, but based on the accumulated experiences of most members here, your experience is not typical. That said, it's not necessarily rare, either. Here are my views on this situation:
For some people, the anti-inflammatory drugs that the GI docs prescribe to treat MC actually work the way that the docs picture them as working. You are obviously one of those fortunate individuals for whom mesalamine gives complete control of symptoms (or, at least it did early on). For many/most of us, though, they don't typically work that well, and we have to avoid certain foods in order to achieve remission, even with the medication. If that drug hadn't worked initially, then you wouldn't be perceiving your current condition as worse. But more than that, there is a possibility that the mesalamine might no longer be beneficial for you.
Did you ever stop taking the mesalamine for a while? Many members find that if they do that, then when they start taking it again, it doesn't work as well as it did the first time. And some people seem to build up a tolerance for the drug, even if they don't stop taking it for a while.
The biggest problem with mesalamine though, is that it is a derivative of salicylic acid, similar to NSAIDs. And we all know that extended use of NSAIDs often leads to the development of MC, for many of us. I'm not aware of any medical research to verify this, but IMO, the extended use of mesalamine can almost surely lead to the production of leukotrienes, similar to NSAIDs. There is existing research, for example, that verifies that for anyone who is sensitive to NSAIDs, then mesalamine can/will trigger the same type of reaction, resulting in inflammation and D for anyone who has an IBD. So this is one possibility (that you have either become sensitive to mesalamine, or tolerant of it, so that it is no longer beneficial). I'm not saying this is the case, I'm just describing possibilities (you asked for a theory).
Your observation that you are more sensitive to certain foods now after you have eliminated them from your diet, than you were initially, is not just your imagination — you actually are more sensitive to them. This phenomenon occurs because after we have been reacting to a food for a long period of time, our immune system becomes sort of dulled to it's effect, and so it's response is toned down somewhat. If we eliminate a food long enough for the antibody level to decline slightly, then when we reintroduce the food, the "challenge" triggers a much more aggressive response, because the immune system "thought" that the danger was past. It is still on high alert however, so when it senses that the same antigen is back again, it launches an all-out response to eliminate the problem. This effect is similar to the rebound effect suffered when a PPI is discontinued, and the parietal cells in the stomach produce much more acid than they did before they were ever exposed to the PPI.
But contrary to what you might suspect, this does not mean that avoiding the food was detrimental to your health, because it clearly shows that you are very sensitive to the food, so it needs to be avoided. It is simply evidence that once your body is free from that food, it wants to stay free from that food, and it throws a tantrum to prove it.
And your perception that you now seem to be more sensitive to other foods is not your imagination, either, because as I explain my theory in the book, the immune system has sort of a one-track mind in that it tends to focus primarily on a single issue at a time. And there is an established hierarchy of food sensitivities, so that once the worst one is out of the diet, then the immune system will begin to focus on what it perceives to be the next most significant threat in the diet, and so on down the line. This is why some people cut out only gluten at first, reach remission, and then a few weeks or so later, they have a relapse of symptoms when their immune system begins to focus on the next food sensitivity, which is usually casein. After casein is eliminated, then soy may show up as a problem, and so fourth and so on.
If you have never had the EnteroLab C Panel, it might be very helpful to see which of those 11 foods might be causing problems.
How about seasonings? You're an excellent cook, and I'm assuming that you might use a wider variety of seasonings than many of us would use. It only takes one regularly-used ingredient to which we might react, or a regular trace of cross-contamination in our diet, to prevent healing from progressing.
I wish I knew of a surefire way to discover the problem, but tracking down problems in difficult cases tends to require serious detective work and sometimes a stroke of luck, as well. The answer is out there, somewhere, if we can just find it.
Tex