This Doctor Probably Isn't As Dumb As He Sounds, But . . .

Feel free to discuss any topic of general interest, so long as nothing you post here is likely to be interpreted as insulting, and/or inflammatory, nor clearly designed to provoke any individual or group. Please be considerate of others feelings, and they will be considerate of yours.

Moderators: Rosie, Stanz, Jean, CAMary, moremuscle, JFR, Dee, xet, Peggy, Matthew, Gabes-Apg, grannyh, Gloria, Mars, starfire, Polly, Joefnh

Post Reply
User avatar
tex
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 35349
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 9:00 am
Location: Central Texas

This Doctor Probably Isn't As Dumb As He Sounds, But . . .

Post by tex »

Hi All,

This article is about a research project designed to demonstrate that IBS does not carry an increased risk of turning into colon cancer, or an IBD, and the researcher, (one Dr. Chey), seems to have done that, according to his description. However, look at what he said in the last two paragraphs of the article that was written, following an interview with him, (the red emphasis is mine, of course):
This research shows that it is unnecessary to order colonoscopies for patients with IBS, unless they show alarming symptoms like unexplained weight loss or anaemia, bleeding from the GI tract, or have a family history of colon cancer, inflammatory bowel disease, or celiac disease, says Dr. Chey.

"Lay people and doctors overuse colonoscopies, which are very expensive procedures, in patients with typical IBS symptoms and no alarm features. Of course, patients over the age of 50 years or who have alarm features should undergo colonoscopy to screen for polyps and colon cancer." Dr. Chey says.

Dr. Chey's research also showed that 2.5% of IBS patients older than >=45 years had an unusual disease called microscopic colitis, compared with 1.5% among the control group. Microscopic colitis can masquerade as IBS in patients with diarrhoea and is important to diagnose because it is treated differently than IBS, he says.
In one breath, he recommends against ordering colonoscopies for IBS patients, and in the next breath, he points out how important it is to diagnose those patients with an "unusual disease" called microscopic colitis. Just how does he expect to diagnose them, without a colonoscopy? :lol: :lol:

Of course, he says that people with "alarming symptoms", (such as bleeding, anemia, etc.), should be scoped, but that recommendation is directed at diagnosing cancer, Crohn's, UC, etc., and it has nothing to do with IBS, (nor MC, for that matter), so that's irrelevant to his study.

And then, to provide us with another good laugh, he complains about "Lay people" and doctors overusing colonoscopies. :yikes: How many "lay people" do you know, who perform colonoscopies, let alone overuse them? :ROFL:

http://www.docguide.com/news/content.ns ... E20000C862

Is it any wonder that so many IBS patients suffer needlessly with MC, when researchers are still turning out recommendations such as this? They still don't get it. I'm beginning to wonder if they ever will.

Tex
:cowboy:

It is suspected that some of the hardest material known to science can be found in the skulls of GI specialists who insist that diet has nothing to do with the treatment of microscopic colitis.
Rosie
Rockhopper Penguin
Rockhopper Penguin
Posts: 746
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2009 5:38 pm
Location: Tucson, AZ

Post by Rosie »

Tex, I thought that IBS is the "default" diagnosis after all other possibilities are eliminated. In order to do that, wouldn't a colonoscopy with biopsies to rule out things like MC be required make an IBS diagnosis?

Also, isn't a routine colonoscopy after age about 55 generally recommended even for those with no symptoms of anything? I know that my PCP was bugging me for 5 years to get one as a screen for cancer, polyps, etc. I avoided it until I started up with my severe D last year and knew something was wrong........

You are right, that doctor doesn't even make sense......

Rosie
Our greatest weakness lies in giving up. The most certain way to succeed is always to try just one more time………Thomas Edison
User avatar
tex
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 35349
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 9:00 am
Location: Central Texas

Post by tex »

Rosie wrote:Tex, I thought that IBS is the "default" diagnosis after all other possibilities are eliminated. In order to do that, wouldn't a colonoscopy with biopsies to rule out things like MC be required make an IBS diagnosis?
That's the way it's supposed to work, and personally, I think that should be an absolute requirement before IBS can be diagnosed, but apparently, many/most doctors have decided that's too much trouble, so they just pretend to rule our a few of the easy options, and then they call it IBS. That's the problem with assigning a name to a non-diagnosis - after a while, doctors begin to assume that it's a legitimate disease, because it has a name. :lol:

Actually, the American Cancer Society currently recommends starting at age 50, but they offer these options:

* Flexible sigmoidoscopy every 5 years*, or
* Colonoscopy every 10 years, or
* Double-contrast barium enema every 5 years*, or
* CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy) every 5 years*

Of course, they're not gonna find MC, unless they take biopsies, and they're not likely to take biopsies, unless they suspect MC. Since MC is a rare disease, many of them rarely suspect it. :lol:

Tex
:cowboy:

It is suspected that some of the hardest material known to science can be found in the skulls of GI specialists who insist that diet has nothing to do with the treatment of microscopic colitis.
Stanz
Rockhopper Penguin
Rockhopper Penguin
Posts: 948
Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 2:35 pm
Location: Oregon

Post by Stanz »

http://esciencenews.com/articles/2008/0 ... dult.women

This doctor has had his research funded by drug companies for YEARS. Another case of treat vs cure???
Resolved MC symptoms successfully w/L-Glutamine, Probiotics and Vitamins, GF since 8/'09. DX w/MC 10/'09.
Post Reply

Return to “Main Message Board”