As many of you know, for years, I have claimed that MC can present not only as chronic diarrhea, (which is the only possibility recognized by the official medical description of the disease), and as alternating diarrhea and constipation, (which several of us on this board have experienced, including myself), but I have also speculated that it can present with constipation as the only remarkable feature. Of course, I had never been able to verify that theory with any medical studies - until today, that is. I finally found proof that this third possibility does indeed exist. Break out the champagne.
Not only does this study verify that it is possible to have MC and never have a single episode of diarrhea, but it also includes some interesting observations relating to a possible cause of the disease, and speculation on why some of the most popular medical treatments support those claims.
If I'm reading this report correctly, it supports food intolerances, (allergies), as a primary cause of collagenous colitis.
But that's not all, folks, (he says excitedly), if I'm reading this correctly, it also implies mast cell involvement, (it specifically mentions histamine involvement), and the authors point out that the effective use of corticosteroids to control the disease, could be construed as evidence that the disease is indeed food allergy based, (because as we all know, the primary purpose of corticosteroid treatment is to quell the inflammation caused by mast cell reactions).
As has often been pointed out, no one knows why the corticosteroids suppress the symptoms of IBDs. That is to say, the mechanism by which corticosteroids control the symptoms of IBD has never been discovered. All we know, is that they work. Well, maybe one of the reasons why they work, for starters, is because they suppress the degranulation of cell cells.
This is a short article, but it contains a lot of eye-opening information, IMO:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1773752/
Though this article is about CC, I see no reason why it would not also apply just as well to LC, (and probably any other form of MC), and it may well have implications for the other IBDs as well. After all, corticosteroids have long been one of the most popular medical treatments for them.
That article was published in 2003 - so why haven't researchers rallied to pursue these "new" revelations?
I think we all know the answer to that question - most researchers are afraid to touch it, because most of this is contrary to the popular prevailing medical consensus, and you don't rock the boat, if you want your articles published, and you're hoping for professional advancement, (rather than setting yourself up for professional ridicule).
Tex

Visit the Microscopic Colitis Foundation Website




