What Do You Think About This?

Feel free to discuss any topic of general interest, so long as nothing you post here is likely to be interpreted as insulting, and/or inflammatory, nor clearly designed to provoke any individual or group. Please be considerate of others feelings, and they will be considerate of yours.

Moderators: Rosie, Stanz, Jean, CAMary, moremuscle, JFR, Dee, xet, Peggy, Matthew, Gabes-Apg, grannyh, Gloria, Mars, starfire, Polly, Joefnh

Post Reply
User avatar
tex
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 35349
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 9:00 am
Location: Central Texas

What Do You Think About This?

Post by tex »

Hi All,

The governor of Montana has asked for federal permission to sell cheaper prescription drugs in his state through the federal Medicaid program.
He said he got a copy of a highly confidential Medicaid drug price list by getting his chief of staff to sign a nondisclosure agreement that is usually handled at the state agency level. Schweitzer said it is obviously unfair to charge one group of people far less than another group of people for the same product.

He said his plan would cost the government nothing - and could even save it money because it would open up the doors for government-subsidized Medicare patients to buy-in at the cheaper Medicaid rate.

"It doesn't cost the citizens of Montana a dime, and it doesn't cost the federal government a dime," said Schweitzer.
He is seeking a waiver from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to allow the unique prescription drug program in Montana. The waiver program is complex, and the application lengthy. Schweitzer said it could take months, or longer, to get an answer.

Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, who oversees the centers, told him she was "intrigued" by the idea, he added. CMMS didn't immediately return a call Tuesday seeking comment on the proposal.

"I don't think we are going to get turned down," Schweitzer said.
He called the drug industry "full of crap" for arguing that the medicine bought in Canada isn't safe for consumption in the United States.

The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, which represents the medical drug industry, declined to comment on his newest proposal until it could look into the plan.
I'm gonna take a wild guess, and predict that the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America will be opposed to the plan. :lol:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... 06129.html

Tex
:cowboy:

It is suspected that some of the hardest material known to science can be found in the skulls of GI specialists who insist that diet has nothing to do with the treatment of microscopic colitis.
grannyh
Rockhopper Penguin
Rockhopper Penguin
Posts: 1014
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 3:22 pm

Post by grannyh »

All depends on who makes the generics... there is a slow but steady trend to get us all onto generics. The problem for older folks like me... I don't tend to absorb as well as a spring chicken might. Generic drugs only have to DO the same thing as a brand name drug.. BUT.. brand name drugs are tested for absobability and generics don't have to meet the same standards.

Can I see drug prices coming down... YES... but what good is a cheap drug my body doesn't absorb..that is a total waste of money... getting off soap box..
grannyh
"yes I take mostly brand name drugs"
User avatar
Gayle
Adélie Penguin
Adélie Penguin
Posts: 221
Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 2:04 pm
Location: Minnesota

Post by Gayle »

Generic drugs must contain the same ACTIVE ingredient their brand name counterparts do – therefore they are 'considered to be' the therapeutic equivalent of the brand name drug.

However, they may contain 1.) different inactive ingredients, and can be 2.) delivered in different delivery mechanisms --- than the brand name medication they are imitating. Sometimes this doesn’t make a difference, sometimes it does.

:dogrun:
Gayle
Post Reply

Return to “Main Message Board”