From the Mayo Clinic:
http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/trans-fat/CL00032When it comes to fat, trans fat is considered by some doctors to be the worst of them all because of its double-barreled impact on your cholesterol levels. Unlike other fats, trans fat — also called trans-fatty acids — both raises your "bad" (LDL) cholesterol and lowers your "good" (HDL) cholesterol.
From Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trans_fatNo trans fats are essential fatty acids; indeed, the consumption of trans fats increases the risk of coronary heart disease[1][2] by raising levels of "bad" LDL cholesterol and lowering levels of "good" HDL cholesterol.[3] Health authorities worldwide recommend that consumption of trans fat be reduced to trace amounts.
(The red emphasis is mine, of course.) Unfortunately, it's not that simple, and that's what makes most health-oriented research conclusions virtually worthless - they're too simplistic, because in order to prove any hypothesis by scientific standards, too many assumptions have to be made in order to "simplify" the analysis so that it will meet scientific standards, and many of those assumptions confound the process, thereby making the conclusions worthless. IOW, the rigors of "required" scientific standards, confound the process of pursuing scientific proof, thereby destroying the accuracy of virtually any attempt to prove just about anything worth proving.
But look at this:
MONDAY, Dec. 20 (HealthDay News) -- New research suggests that whole-fat dairy products -- generally shunned by health experts -- contain a fatty acid that may lower the risk of type 2 diabetes.
The fatty acid is called trans-palmitoleic acid, according to the study in the Dec. 21 issue of the Annals of Internal Medicine, and people with the highest blood levels of this fatty acid reduce their odds of diabetes by 62 percent compared to those with the lowest blood levels of it.
In addition, "people who had higher levels of this fatty acid had better cholesterol and triglyceride levels, lower insulin resistance and lower levels of inflammatory markers," said study author Dr. Dariush Mozaffarian, co-director of the program in cardiovascular epidemiology at Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard School of Public Health.
http://consumer.healthday.com/Article.asp?AID=647637Dr. Sue Kirkman, senior vice president of medical affairs and community information for the American Diabetes Association, agreed that it's too soon to change dietary guidelines, but said the findings do suggest "that things may be more complicated than we might simplistically think. It looks like we can't say all trans-fats are bad, as this one was associated with decreases in diabetes, insulin resistance and C-reactive protein levels."
Clearly, all trans-fats are not created equal, and yet the majority of the world's so-called "health experts", continue to spread misinformation, because of their simplistic approach to the subject. So what else is new? Of course, maybe this study is flawed, also.
The primary problem for most of these "health experts", of course, is their preconceived notion of what is healthy, and what is not, and their unwarranted bias against fats in general. Scientists should not be biased, so what's their excuse?
Tex

Visit the Microscopic Colitis Foundation Website


