what's the mechanism behind a sponteneous remission

Feel free to discuss any topic of general interest, so long as nothing you post here is likely to be interpreted as insulting, and/or inflammatory, nor clearly designed to provoke any individual or group. Please be considerate of others feelings, and they will be considerate of yours.

Moderators: Rosie, Stanz, Jean, CAMary, moremuscle, JFR, Dee, xet, Peggy, Matthew, Gabes-Apg, grannyh, Gloria, Mars, starfire, Polly, Joefnh

User avatar
MaggieRedwings
King Penguin
King Penguin
Posts: 3865
Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 3:16 am
Location: SE Pennsylvania

Post by MaggieRedwings »

I think the 7-year thing may sprout from the - in my book at least - an old time expression that your body changes every 7 years. I am sure it is a practical thing and even have had my doctor say it once. Maybe that is where someone might presume it is a 7-cycle disease. I am here to firmly say NOT! in my case.

Love, Maggie
Maggie Scarpone
___________________
Resident Birder - I live to bird and enjoy life!
grannyh
Rockhopper Penguin
Rockhopper Penguin
Posts: 1014
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 3:22 pm

Post by grannyh »

Come to think of it.. I had about 6 years of remission with entocort.. when the spontaneous one started.. wonder if that means my remission without entocort will only last a year...LOL
grannyh
User avatar
tex
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 35349
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 9:00 am
Location: Central Texas

Post by tex »

Speaking of worthless claims, research shows that MC "runs it's course" in slightly over 3 years:
CONCLUSIONS: Lymphocytic colitis is characterised by a benign course with resolution of diarrhoea and normalisation of histology in over 80% of patients within 38 months. Considering the benign course of the disease, the potential benefit of any drug treatment should be carefully weighed against its potential side effects.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9824342
CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort of patients, 63% had lasting resolution of symptoms after a mean 3.5 yr follow-up. There was a high incidence of arthritis and NSAID use in our population, but there was no relationship between these entities and clinical course or histology. Initial histology, except possibly for Paneth cell metaplasia, did not reliably predict severity or course of disease. Finally, although variable in clinical presentation, treatment-free remissions are common in collagenous colitis.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8995938

:BSFlag: :ROFL:

Tex
:cowboy:

It is suspected that some of the hardest material known to science can be found in the skulls of GI specialists who insist that diet has nothing to do with the treatment of microscopic colitis.
grannyh
Rockhopper Penguin
Rockhopper Penguin
Posts: 1014
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 3:22 pm

Post by grannyh »

Tex,
The government is definitely full of crap!
User avatar
Gloria
King Penguin
King Penguin
Posts: 4767
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 8:19 am
Location: Illinois

Post by Gloria »

Tex wrote:research shows that MC "runs it's course" in slightly over 3 years:
Gee, I'm overdue by about a year. Guess I have to wait another three years for the second time frame.

Gloria
You never know what you can do until you have to do it.
grannyh
Rockhopper Penguin
Rockhopper Penguin
Posts: 1014
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 3:22 pm

Post by grannyh »

Seems to be studies are done.. just to get a grant, get something published! No wonder most doctors have no clue how to treat MC!

Tell anyone in the ER with D and dehydration how benign CC is! Been there and I was treated horribly.. told my condition was all my fault.. should have kept up my liquid intake.. and oh by the way.. how much did I drink and what recreational drugs was I taking??!!! I was not a happy camper.. they absolutely would not believe I was neither a drinker or recreational drug user..even sent in a specialist to evaluate me and try to get me into a detox program.. Once in a room I refused to have the detox doctor in my room.. by then I was furious.. refusing to see him probably made the rest of the staff more sure than ever I was an addict of some sort.

When I paid the bill from the detox doctor I enclosed a note and said I was not addicted to anything..told him my diagnosis and said I never wanted him to show up in a hospital room with me again..
grannyh
User avatar
tex
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 35349
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 9:00 am
Location: Central Texas

Post by tex »

GrannyH,

If those dunces were so sure that you were full of alcohol and drugs, they could have easily verified that accusation with some simple blood tests, but I guess they were so smart that they don't need tests to evaluate patients - they can tell just by looking. :roll:

Tex
:cowboy:

It is suspected that some of the hardest material known to science can be found in the skulls of GI specialists who insist that diet has nothing to do with the treatment of microscopic colitis.
grannyh
Rockhopper Penguin
Rockhopper Penguin
Posts: 1014
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 3:22 pm

Post by grannyh »

Tex,
I have to admit I was a mess... was throwing up and had D.. hair was a mess and I was in ratty clothes.. I really was in no shape to get pretty for the rushed trip to the hospital that the doctor ordered... but, yes, they could have checked for drugs and alcohol before treating my like an indigent addict. When they did give me something to stop the barfing they put it in too fast and ruined a vein.. they were not kind about the iv insertion either...
grannyh
User avatar
tex
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 35349
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 9:00 am
Location: Central Texas

Post by tex »

A patients appearance is no excuse for shoddy treatment, because we can't always pick the times that we are seriously ill, and if we're really sick, we can't afford to worry about whether or not we're well-groomed.

That reminds me of an old rancher's trick for judging the condition of a sick cow. If a cow is licking herself, (or her calf), (IOW, if she's well-groomed), she's not deathly ill, and she will probably recover from whatever is bothering her at the moment. If she's not well-groomed, it's probably because she knows that she's dying, and either she is beyond help, or she needs serious life-saving intervention.

Thinking back, while reviewing the notes made in the ER when I went there for my first TIA, (in July, 2009), I noticed that one of entries logged by the nurse was "Patient appears to be well-groomed". :shock: My thoughts were, "what difference would it make?" If my hair wasn't combed, or if I had been working, so that my clothes were dirty, would it mean that they wouldn't have believed anything that I said, (especially since other than high BP, their tests showed everything to be normal)? Why would they even log such an observation, unless it mattered?

Apparently, ER personnel feel much more at ease treating "neat" patients. :roll: Disheveled patients beware. :lol:

Tex
:cowboy:

It is suspected that some of the hardest material known to science can be found in the skulls of GI specialists who insist that diet has nothing to do with the treatment of microscopic colitis.
grannyh
Rockhopper Penguin
Rockhopper Penguin
Posts: 1014
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 3:22 pm

Post by grannyh »

WOW, I had forgotten all about the "appearance" part when my husband was admitted for his high blood pressure (the one that brought on my remission:)).. I got a copy of all of his records when he checked out.. and that was noted.. and yes he was neatly dressed.

Appearance doesn't seem to be a very scientific way to judge whether the patient might be an addict ... or if they can pay their bill.. I am amazed at the amount of money people are paying to wear jeans that look like they should be thrown away...LOL
grannyh
Post Reply

Return to “Main Message Board”